This trial, known as Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District, could result in the setting of a national precedence.
I find it hard to explain to anyone who we are, or how we came to be. Like most people I wonder about the mysteries of the universe. Regardless of your personal perception three things are certain in this life. You are born, you pay taxes, and you will die. One way people deal with this mystery is in the belief of a higher being.
A loving God who will reward you if you are nice on earth. If for some reason you should act on your human nature in a socially disapproving way, you will go to hell. But he is an all forgiving God. It is this belief in a higher being that has inspired many people from all corners of the world.
Faith, the belief in something that cannot be seen. Faith is a very personal and powerful part if many peoples lives, including myself. While faith is enough to satisfy the curiosity of many, there are those who seek more proof and understanding in our world.
So this sets up for the debate of all debates, who are we and were did we come from? On one side we have Intelligent Design, or I. In their view there is a higher being God who us being it all. This is a debate which really has three sides. A Gallup poll showed that thirty-eight percent of people believed wholly in Creationism, forty-three percent believed in a more intelligent design like theory, but only eighteen percent believed in the evolution theory.
Intelligent design has a very interesting stance. They are not respected in the academic field because they lack integrity. Not only has intelligent design not gained acceptance in the academic world, it has also failed to find warm embrace at many evangelical christen colleges.
Goodstein,Laurie The problem they face lie in the way they present their argument. They believe that certain things are far to complicated for us, why even bother trying to explain?
While this is acceptable to them, I believe we have a brain for a reason. If we stop being curious. If we accept that things are the way they are and stop seeking answers. In the sense that there are holes and gaps in it.
Meanwhile they present no theories of their own.
When and were intelligent design occurs is impossible to prove or disprove, but they are skeptical about when and were species evolve.Oct 11, · Again, your issue is that you want to control the agenda about what kids are taught to think.
Teaching them how to reason is not what you are concerned with, otherwise you would be much more concerned about math and english education than about matters of religious faith. Intelligent design gained traction in the s and early s, when Christian groups pushed for it to be taught in public schools, often alongside lessons on evolution.
"We have absolutely nothing in these standards in reference to intelligent design," she said. The publication, however, cited a recording of Douglas speaking to Republican candidates last November insisting that Intelligent Design should be taught alongside evolution in schools.
Even the president of the United States has lent a sympathetic ear: George W. Bush recently told reporters in Texas that intelligent design should be taught in public schools alongside evolution because "part of education is to expose people to different schools of thought.".
schools with remarks saying that schoolchildren should be taught about "intelligent design," a view of creation that challenges established scientific thinking and promotes the idea that an unseen force is behind the development of humanity.
"Intelligent Design" should not be taught in public schools because, to paraphrase a question in the text, science and religion are incompatible opposites of each other. (The National Academy of Sciences and the Institute of Medicine of the National Academics 28).